Barbados vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Barbados
133.05 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
148.75 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
9th
Rwanda rank
7th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Rwanda
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 148.75 1000 USD per square kilometre against 133.05 1000 USD per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 15.7 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 279.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 52.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 227.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 231.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 75.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 156.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 186.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 98.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 88.39 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 163.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 95.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 68.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 143.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 126.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.52 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 118.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 140.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.41 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 126.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 144.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.91 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Barbados or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 148.75 1000 USD per square kilometre against 133.05 1000 USD per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Barbados and Rwanda?
15.7 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Rwanda rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Barbados ranks 9th and Rwanda ranks 7th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/rwanda/">Barbados vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.