Australia vs Bhutan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Australia
3.94 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
4.39 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
124th
Bhutan rank
122nd

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Australia
  • Bhutan
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 4.39 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.94 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.45 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Australia ranks 124th and Bhutan ranks 122nd of 140 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bhutan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8215 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.3 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 1.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.77 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.69 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 1.95 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.48 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 2.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 2.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.06 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 3.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Australia or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 4.39 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.94 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Australia and Bhutan?
0.45 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Australia ranks 124th and Bhutan ranks 122nd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bhutan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/bhutan/">Australia vs Bhutan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.