Argentina vs Congo: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Argentina
9.74 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
8.73 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
99th
Congo rank
101st

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Argentina
  • Congo
2.557.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 9.74 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Argentina ranks 99th and Congo ranks 101st of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 2.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.275 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 3.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.271 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 4.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5154 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 5.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 8.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.92 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 12.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 12.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.68 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Argentina or Congo?
Argentina, at 9.74 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.73 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Argentina and Congo?
1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Congo rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Argentina ranks 99th and Congo ranks 101st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Congo: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-rep/">Argentina vs Congo: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.