How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Malta

0.0478 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Namibia

0.0527 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Malta rank

135th

Namibia rank

133rd

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Malta
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0527 1000 USD per person against 0.0478 1000 USD per person in Malta, a difference of 0.0049 1000 USD per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.1561 1000 USD per person	0.0715 1000 USD per person	0.0846 1000 USD per person	Malta
1970s	0.1831 1000 USD per person	0.0667 1000 USD per person	0.1164 1000 USD per person	Malta
1980s	0.1991 1000 USD per person	0.0625 1000 USD per person	0.1366 1000 USD per person	Malta
1990s	0.2162 1000 USD per person	0.053 1000 USD per person	0.1632 1000 USD per person	Malta
2000s	0.1893 1000 USD per person	0.065 1000 USD per person	0.1243 1000 USD per person	Malta
2010s	0.1475 1000 USD per person	0.0668 1000 USD per person	0.0807 1000 USD per person	Malta
2020s	0.0549 1000 USD per person	0.0633 1000 USD per person	0.0084 1000 USD per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Malta or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0527 1000 USD per person against 0.0478 1000 USD per person in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Malta and Namibia?: 0.0049 1000 USD per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Malta ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 133rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 8,080 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.