Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Equatorial Guinea
0.0676 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Iceland
0.06 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
129th
Iceland rank
131st

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Iceland
00.20.40.6196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0676 1000 USD per person against 0.06 1000 USD per person in Iceland, a difference of 0.0076 1000 USD per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th and Iceland ranks 131st of 140 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5649 1000 USD per person 0.0506 1000 USD per person 0.5144 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.3009 1000 USD per person 0.049 1000 USD per person 0.2519 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.212 1000 USD per person 0.0683 1000 USD per person 0.1436 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1629 1000 USD per person 0.069 1000 USD per person 0.0939 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.1126 1000 USD per person 0.0833 1000 USD per person 0.0293 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.086 1000 USD per person 0.081 1000 USD per person 0.005 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0715 1000 USD per person 0.069 1000 USD per person 0.0024 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Equatorial Guinea or Iceland?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0676 1000 USD per person against 0.06 1000 USD per person in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Equatorial Guinea and Iceland?
0.0076 1000 USD per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Iceland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Iceland rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 129th and Iceland ranks 131st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/iceland/">Equatorial Guinea vs Iceland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 8,080 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.