How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Ecuador

0.3035 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Tunisia

0.2884 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador rank

59th

Tunisia rank

61st

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Ecuador
Tunisia

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.3035 1000 USD per person against 0.2884 1000 USD per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0151 1000 USD per person.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 59th and Tunisia ranks 61st of 140 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.3887 1000 USD per person	0.1726 1000 USD per person	0.2161 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1970s	0.3106 1000 USD per person	0.2017 1000 USD per person	0.1089 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1980s	0.2553 1000 USD per person	0.1903 1000 USD per person	0.0651 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
1990s	0.3007 1000 USD per person	0.2224 1000 USD per person	0.0783 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2000s	0.2847 1000 USD per person	0.2239 1000 USD per person	0.0607 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2010s	0.2868 1000 USD per person	0.2603 1000 USD per person	0.0265 1000 USD per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.2878 1000 USD per person	0.2857 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Ecuador or Tunisia?: Ecuador, at 0.3035 1000 USD per person against 0.2884 1000 USD per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Ecuador and Tunisia?: 0.0151 1000 USD per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Ecuador ranks 59th and Tunisia ranks 61st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 8,080 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.