Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tajikistan: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Saint Kitts and Nevis
98.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tajikistan
92.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
84th
Tajikistan rank
85th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tajikistan
20406080100120196119922023

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 98.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 92.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tajikistan, a difference of 6.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th and Tajikistan ranks 85th of 142 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1990s 70.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 24.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre 45.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 53.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 41.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 94.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre 74.27 1000 SLC per square kilometre 20.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 103.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 91.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tajikistan?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 98.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 92.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tajikistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tajikistan?
6.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tajikistan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tajikistan rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 84th and Tajikistan ranks 85th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tajikistan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tajikistan/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tajikistan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.