Romania vs South Africa: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Romania
147.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
142.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
80th
South Africa rank
81st

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Romania
  • South Africa
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 147.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 142.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 5.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 80th and South Africa ranks 81st of 142 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 127.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre 43.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 84.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1970s 163.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre 61.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 102.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1980s 211.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 138.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1990s 161.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre 81.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 79.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2000s 158.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 94.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 64.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2010s 182.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre 112.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 69.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2020s 155.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre 138.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Romania or South Africa?
Romania, at 147.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 142.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Romania and South Africa?
5.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Romania ranks 80th and South Africa ranks 81st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs South Africa: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/">Romania vs South Africa: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.