Poland vs South Africa: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Poland
139.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
142.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland rank
82nd
South Africa rank
81st

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Poland
  • South Africa
255075100125150196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 142.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 139.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 3.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 82nd and South Africa ranks 81st of 142 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 113.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre 43.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 69.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
1970s 128.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 61.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 67.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
1980s 127.62 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 54.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
1990s 125.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 78.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 46.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
2000s 116 1000 SLC per square kilometre 94.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 21.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
2010s 123.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 112.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
2020s 138.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre 138.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.197 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Poland or South Africa?
South Africa, at 142.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 139.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Poland and South Africa?
3.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Poland and South Africa rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Poland ranks 82nd and South Africa ranks 81st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs South Africa: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/poland/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/poland/south-africa/">Poland vs South Africa: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.