Nepal vs Pakistan: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Nepal
5,161 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
4,904 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
30th
Pakistan rank
31st

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 5,161 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 4,904 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 257 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 31st of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 864.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre 785.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 79.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 1,018 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,211 1000 SLC per square kilometre 193.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 1,399 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,761 1000 SLC per square kilometre 362.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 2,159 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,465 1000 SLC per square kilometre 305.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 3,020 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,083 1000 SLC per square kilometre 63.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 4,349 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,740 1000 SLC per square kilometre 609.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 5,097 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,465 1000 SLC per square kilometre 631.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Nepal or Pakistan?
Nepal, at 5,161 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 4,904 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Nepal and Pakistan?
257 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Pakistan rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Nepal ranks 30th and Pakistan ranks 31st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Pakistan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/nepal/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/nepal/pakistan/">Nepal vs Pakistan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.