Malawi vs Rwanda: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Malawi
56,965 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
108,501 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
8th
Rwanda rank
5th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Malawi
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 108,501 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 56,965 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 51,536 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.9 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 3,968 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37,934 1000 SLC per square kilometre 33,966 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 6,099 1000 SLC per square kilometre 54,741 1000 SLC per square kilometre 48,642 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 7,021 1000 SLC per square kilometre 71,886 1000 SLC per square kilometre 64,865 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 11,330 1000 SLC per square kilometre 69,660 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58,330 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 22,227 1000 SLC per square kilometre 92,295 1000 SLC per square kilometre 70,068 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 41,238 1000 SLC per square kilometre 102,201 1000 SLC per square kilometre 60,963 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 56,006 1000 SLC per square kilometre 105,639 1000 SLC per square kilometre 49,633 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Malawi or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 108,501 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 56,965 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Malawi and Rwanda?
51,536 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Malawi ranks 8th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.