Kuwait vs Namibia: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Kuwait
3.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
2.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
137th
Namibia rank
139th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Kuwait
  • Namibia
012345196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 3.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.96 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Kuwait ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 139th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0462 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7243 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6781 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.1111 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8789 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7678 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5429 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.7143 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.27 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5605 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 2.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0924 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait
2010s 4.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 3.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9015 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Kuwait or Namibia?
Kuwait, at 3.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Kuwait and Namibia?
0.96 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and Namibia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Kuwait ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 139th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/kuwait/namibia/">Kuwait vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.