Hungary vs Jamaica: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Hungary
13,087 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
13,710 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
19th
Jamaica rank
18th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Hungary
  • Jamaica
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 13,710 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 13,087 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 623 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 19th and Jamaica ranks 18th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Jamaica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 10,588 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,789 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,799 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 12,993 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,343 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,650 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 15,164 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,505 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,659 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 12,842 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13,097 1000 SLC per square kilometre 254.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 12,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11,882 1000 SLC per square kilometre 892.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 12,968 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12,056 1000 SLC per square kilometre 912.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 11,992 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13,481 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,489 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Hungary or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 13,710 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 13,087 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Hungary and Jamaica?
623 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Jamaica rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Hungary ranks 19th and Jamaica ranks 18th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Jamaica: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/hungary/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/hungary/jamaica/">Hungary vs Jamaica: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.