Guinea vs Malawi: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Guinea
63,306 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
56,965 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
7th
Malawi rank
8th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Guinea
  • Malawi
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 63,306 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 56,965 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 6,341 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 7th and Malawi ranks 8th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 10,367 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,968 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,399 1000 SLC per square kilometre Guinea
1970s 11,612 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,099 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,512 1000 SLC per square kilometre Guinea
1980s 13,485 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,021 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,464 1000 SLC per square kilometre Guinea
1990s 20,080 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11,330 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,750 1000 SLC per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 25,782 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22,227 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,556 1000 SLC per square kilometre Guinea
2010s 38,888 1000 SLC per square kilometre 41,238 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,350 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 57,300 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56,006 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,294 1000 SLC per square kilometre Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Guinea or Malawi?
Guinea, at 63,306 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 56,965 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Guinea and Malawi?
6,341 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Guinea ranks 7th and Malawi ranks 8th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Malawi: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/guinea/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/guinea/malawi/">Guinea vs Malawi: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.