Gambia vs Nicaragua: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Gambia
360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua
323.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
64th
Nicaragua rank
66th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Gambia
  • Nicaragua
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 323.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 37.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 64th and Nicaragua ranks 66th of 142 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 383.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 91.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre 291.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 371.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 125.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 245.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 387.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 124.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 262.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 372.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 131.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 240.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 610.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 199.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 410.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 532.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 269.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 263.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 338.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 336.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Gambia or Nicaragua?
Gambia, at 360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 323.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Gambia and Nicaragua?
37.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Nicaragua rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Gambia ranks 64th and Nicaragua ranks 66th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Nicaragua: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/nicaragua/">Gambia vs Nicaragua: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.