Gambia vs Mozambique: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Gambia
360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
356.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
64th
Mozambique rank
65th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Gambia
  • Mozambique
02004006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 356.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 3.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 64th and Mozambique ranks 65th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 383.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 69.58 1000 SLC per square kilometre 313.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 371.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 82.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 288.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 387.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 83.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 303.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 372.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 113.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 259.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 610.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 168.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre 441.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 532.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 235.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 296.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 338.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 351.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Gambia or Mozambique?
Gambia, at 360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 356.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Gambia and Mozambique?
3.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Mozambique rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Gambia ranks 64th and Mozambique ranks 65th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/mozambique/">Gambia vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.