El Salvador vs Zambia: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

El Salvador
48.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
45.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
96th
Zambia rank
99th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • El Salvador
  • Zambia
0204060196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 48.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 45.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 99th of 142 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 40.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre 36.58 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 54.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre 49.27 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 56.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 50.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 58.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 49.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 57.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 44.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 52.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 24.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 28.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 49.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 40.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, El Salvador or Zambia?
El Salvador, at 48.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 45.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between El Salvador and Zambia?
2.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Zambia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
El Salvador ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 99th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/zambia/">El Salvador vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.