Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Ecuador
21.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
18.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
118th
Zimbabwe rank
119th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 21.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 18.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 7.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 7.84 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.62 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 8.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6358 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 12.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 15.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 18.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 20.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Ecuador, at 21.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 18.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
2.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Ecuador ranks 118th and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.