Cuba vs Switzerland: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Cuba
73.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
52.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
92nd
Switzerland rank
94th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Cuba
  • Switzerland
50100150200196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 73.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 52.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Switzerland, a difference of 21.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.4 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

Cuba ranks 92nd and Switzerland ranks 94th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 47.96 1000 SLC per square kilometre 68.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 20.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 63.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 66.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s 81.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 72.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 85.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 67.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 177.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre 59.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 178.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre 120.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 103.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre 53.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre 50.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Cuba or Switzerland?
Cuba, at 73.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 52.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Switzerland as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Cuba and Switzerland?
21.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Switzerland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Switzerland rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Cuba ranks 92nd and Switzerland ranks 94th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Switzerland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cuba/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cuba/switzerland/">Cuba vs Switzerland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.