Congo vs Mauritius: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Congo
4,825 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
3,712 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
32nd
Mauritius rank
34th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritius
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 4,825 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,712 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 1,113 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Congo ranks 32nd and Mauritius ranks 34th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 1,610 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,210 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,600 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 1,743 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,597 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,854 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 2,175 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,595 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,420 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2,354 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,894 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,541 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 3,197 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,675 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,478 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 4,368 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,038 1000 SLC per square kilometre 330.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
2020s 4,786 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,283 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,503 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Congo or Mauritius?
Congo, at 4,825 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,712 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Congo and Mauritius?
1,113 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mauritius rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Congo ranks 32nd and Mauritius ranks 34th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritius: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritius/">Congo vs Mauritius: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.