Chad vs Thailand: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Chad
1,203 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
2,147 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
43rd
Thailand rank
41st

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chad
  • Thailand
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 2,147 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1,203 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 944 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.8 times Chad's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 43rd and Thailand ranks 41st of 142 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 368.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre 438.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 70.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 373.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre 638.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 265.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 425.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre 927.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 501.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 599.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,186 1000 SLC per square kilometre 586.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 750.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,687 1000 SLC per square kilometre 936.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 1,194 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,050 1000 SLC per square kilometre 856.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 1,235 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,108 1000 SLC per square kilometre 873.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Chad or Thailand?
Thailand, at 2,147 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1,203 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Chad and Thailand?
944 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Thailand?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Thailand rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Chad ranks 43rd and Thailand ranks 41st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Thailand: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chad/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chad/thailand/">Chad vs Thailand: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.