Cambodia vs Rwanda: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Cambodia
229,929 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
108,501 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
5th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Cambodia
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 229,929 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 108,501 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 121,428 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 2.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 59,056 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37,934 1000 SLC per square kilometre 21,122 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 42,428 1000 SLC per square kilometre 54,741 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12,313 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 38,845 1000 SLC per square kilometre 71,886 1000 SLC per square kilometre 33,042 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 49,289 1000 SLC per square kilometre 69,426 1000 SLC per square kilometre 20,137 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 79,104 1000 SLC per square kilometre 92,295 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13,191 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 192,107 1000 SLC per square kilometre 102,201 1000 SLC per square kilometre 89,905 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 218,320 1000 SLC per square kilometre 105,639 1000 SLC per square kilometre 112,682 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Cambodia or Rwanda?
Cambodia, at 229,929 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 108,501 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Cambodia and Rwanda?
121,428 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Rwanda rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Cambodia ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/rwanda/">Cambodia vs Rwanda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.