Brazil vs El Salvador: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Brazil
52.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
48.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
95th
El Salvador rank
96th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Brazil
  • El Salvador
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 52.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 48.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 3.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

Brazil ranks 95th and El Salvador ranks 96th of 142 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 8.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 40.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 32.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 10.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre 54.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 44.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 14.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 41.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
1990s 17.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 60 1000 SLC per square kilometre 42.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 26.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 55.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 28.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 38.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 52.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 14.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 47.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 49.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Brazil or El Salvador?
Brazil, at 52.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 48.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Brazil and El Salvador?
3.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and El Salvador rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Brazil ranks 95th and El Salvador ranks 96th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs El Salvador: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/brazil/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/brazil/el-salvador/">Brazil vs El Salvador: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.