Bhutan vs Mozambique: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Bhutan
280.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
356.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
68th
Mozambique rank
65th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Bhutan
  • Mozambique
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 356.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 280.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 76.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.3 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 68th and Mozambique ranks 65th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 200 1000 SLC per square kilometre 69.58 1000 SLC per square kilometre 130.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 245.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre 82.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 163.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 327.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 83.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 244.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 411.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre 113.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 297.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 401.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre 168.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre 232.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 446.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre 235.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 210.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 327.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 351.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre 24.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Bhutan or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 356.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 280.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Bhutan and Mozambique?
76.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Mozambique rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Bhutan ranks 68th and Mozambique ranks 65th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/mozambique/">Bhutan vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.