Australia vs Canada: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Australia
4.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
3.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
135th
Canada rank
136th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
0246196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 4.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 1.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 135th and Canada ranks 136th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Canada in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 1.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0653 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1970s 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.043 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1980s 1.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0148 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1990s 2.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2352 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2000s 2.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5145 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2010s 3.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2633 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2020s 4.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Australia or Canada?
Australia, at 4.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Australia and Canada?
1.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Australia ranks 135th and Canada ranks 136th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,030 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.