Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Crops: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita SLC

Equatorial Guinea
37.17 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
33.84 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
37th
New Caledonia rank
38th

Crops: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita SLC over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • New Caledonia
0100200300196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 37.17 1000 SLC per person against 33.84 1000 SLC per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 3.33 1000 SLC per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th and New Caledonia ranks 38th of 142 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 310.67 1000 SLC per person 167.15 1000 SLC per person 143.52 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 165.48 1000 SLC per person 103.41 1000 SLC per person 62.08 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 116.56 1000 SLC per person 96.08 1000 SLC per person 20.48 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 89.6 1000 SLC per person 53.88 1000 SLC per person 35.72 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 61.92 1000 SLC per person 31.05 1000 SLC per person 30.87 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 47.28 1000 SLC per person 31.64 1000 SLC per person 15.64 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 39.3 1000 SLC per person 33.37 1000 SLC per person 5.93 1000 SLC per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Equatorial Guinea or New Caledonia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 37.17 1000 SLC per person against 33.84 1000 SLC per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia?
3.33 1000 SLC per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and New Caledonia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 37th and New Caledonia ranks 38th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/new-caledonia/">Equatorial Guinea vs New Caledonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita
Unit
1000 SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,170 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.