Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Denmark
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
133rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Denmark
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.0010.0010.0020.002196119922024

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Denmark ranks 133rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0015 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0013 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0007 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0006 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0008 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Denmark
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Denmark or Equatorial Guinea?
Denmark, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Denmark and Equatorial Guinea?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Equatorial Guinea?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Denmark ranks 133rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/equatorial-guinea/">Denmark vs Equatorial Guinea: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,311 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.