Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Rwanda
115.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
113.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
4th
Sri Lanka rank
6th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 115.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 113.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 31.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 46.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 64.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 44.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 63.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 68.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 89.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 83.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 106.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 110.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 112.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 117.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 115.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 113.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Rwanda ranks 4th and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.