Portugal vs Uganda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Portugal
51.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
51.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal rank
36th
Uganda rank
37th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Portugal
  • Uganda
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 51.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 51.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 37th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 42.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 38.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 34.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 36.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 33.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 37.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 49.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Portugal or Uganda?
Portugal, at 51.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 51.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Portugal and Uganda?
0.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Portugal and Uganda rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Portugal ranks 36th and Uganda ranks 37th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Uganda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/portugal/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/portugal/uganda/">Portugal vs Uganda: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.