New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

New Zealand
7.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
121st
Zimbabwe rank
120th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
2468196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Zealand ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 2.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7428 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 3.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 4.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6593 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 5.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9365 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 6.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 7.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
0.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
New Zealand ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/zimbabwe/">New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.