Nepal vs Portugal: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Nepal
54.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
51.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
34th
Portugal rank
36th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Nepal
  • Portugal
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 54.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 51.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 2.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Nepal ranks 34th and Portugal ranks 36th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 9.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 42.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 11.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 15.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 34.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 23.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 32.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 33.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7669 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 46.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 37.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 53.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Nepal or Portugal?
Nepal, at 54.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 51.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Nepal and Portugal?
2.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Portugal rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Nepal ranks 34th and Portugal ranks 36th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Portugal: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/nepal/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/nepal/portugal/">Nepal vs Portugal: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.