Nauru vs Tuvalu: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Nauru
33.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
35.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
58th
Tuvalu rank
55th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Nauru
  • Tuvalu
152025303540196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 35.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 33.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 2.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Nauru ranks 58th and Tuvalu ranks 55th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 3 and Tuvalu in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 17.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 29.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1970s 20.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 25.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 24.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 29.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 27.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nauru
2010s 32.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 33.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Nauru or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 35.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 33.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Nauru and Tuvalu?
2.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Tuvalu rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Nauru ranks 58th and Tuvalu ranks 55th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Tuvalu: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/naoero/tuvalu/">Nauru vs Tuvalu: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.