Mexico vs Paraguay: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Mexico
19.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
16.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
87th
Paraguay rank
90th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Mexico
  • Paraguay
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 19.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 16.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Paraguay, a difference of 2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 87th and Paraguay ranks 90th of 172 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 4.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 6.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 8.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 10.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 12.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 15.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5348 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 18.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Mexico or Paraguay?
Mexico, at 19.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 16.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Mexico and Paraguay?
2.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Paraguay rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Mexico ranks 87th and Paraguay ranks 90th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Paraguay: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mexico/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mexico/paraguay/">Mexico vs Paraguay: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.