Mauritania vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Mauritania
0.2632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.2527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
168th
Namibia rank
169th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.2632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Mauritania ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 169th of 172 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0565 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0227 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1781 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0787 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.1666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.2358 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Mauritania or Namibia?
Mauritania, at 0.2632 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Mauritania and Namibia?
0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Mauritania ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 169th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.