Maldives vs Tunisia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Maldives
27.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
30 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
70th
Tunisia rank
67th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Maldives
  • Tunisia
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 30 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 27.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Maldives ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 30.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 40.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 29.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 51.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 32.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 20.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 39.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 28.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 27.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6353 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 27.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Maldives or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 30 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 27.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Maldives and Tunisia?
2.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Tunisia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Tunisia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Maldives ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Tunisia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/maldives/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/maldives/tunisia/">Maldives vs Tunisia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.