Iceland vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Iceland
0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.2527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
172nd
Namibia rank
169th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.2527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.1941 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 4.3 times Iceland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 172nd and Namibia ranks 169th of 172 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0253 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0511 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0914 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0525 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0486 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1781 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1713 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0582 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Iceland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.2527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0586 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Iceland and Namibia?
0.1941 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Iceland ranks 172nd and Namibia ranks 169th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.