Guyana vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Guyana
3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana rank
145th
Zambia rank
144th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Guyana
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 145th and Zambia ranks 144th of 172 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.978 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1970s 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8308 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 1.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Guyana or Zambia?
Zambia, at 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Guyana and Zambia?
0.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Zambia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Guyana ranks 145th and Zambia ranks 144th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guyana/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guyana/zambia/">Guyana vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.