France vs Guatemala: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

France
58.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
57.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
27th
Guatemala rank
28th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • France
  • Guatemala
0204060196119922023

How they compare

France currently reports 58.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 57.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

France ranks 27th and Guatemala ranks 28th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, France averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 45.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1970s 49.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1980s 55.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1990s 57.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 25.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2000s 58.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2010s 58.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 56.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2020s 56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 60.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, France or Guatemala?
France, at 58.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 57.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between France and Guatemala?
0.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do France and Guatemala rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
France ranks 27th and Guatemala ranks 28th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Guatemala: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/france/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/france/guatemala/">France vs Guatemala: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.