Barbados vs Tuvalu: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Barbados
33.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
35.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
57th
Tuvalu rank
55th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • Tuvalu
050100150200196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 35.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 33.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 57th and Tuvalu ranks 55th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 6 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 180.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 29.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 150.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 128.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 104.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 103.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 76.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 74.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 50.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 62.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 27.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 37.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 30.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Barbados or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 35.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 33.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Barbados and Tuvalu?
2.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Tuvalu rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Barbados ranks 57th and Tuvalu ranks 55th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Tuvalu: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/barbados/tuvalu/">Barbados vs Tuvalu: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.