Bahamas vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Bahamas
3.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
141st
Zambia rank
144th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 3.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 144th of 172 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6673 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 1.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9199 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 1.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 2.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 3.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 3.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5902 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Bahamas or Zambia?
Bahamas, at 3.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Bahamas and Zambia?
0.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zambia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Bahamas ranks 141st and Zambia ranks 144th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/zambia/">Bahamas vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.