Australia vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Australia
3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
147th
Zambia rank
144th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Australia
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 147th and Zambia ranks 144th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2241 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.8896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7731 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4493 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 1.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.384 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Australia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Australia and Zambia?
0.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Australia ranks 147th and Zambia ranks 144th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/zambia/">Australia vs Zambia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.