Australia vs Guyana: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Australia
3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
147th
Guyana rank
145th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Australia
  • Guyana
1234196119922023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.

Australia ranks 147th and Guyana ranks 145th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Guyana in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7539 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1970s 0.8896 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2714 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 1.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 2.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 3.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Australia or Guyana?
Guyana, at 3.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Australia and Guyana?
0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Guyana rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Australia ranks 147th and Guyana ranks 145th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Guyana: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/australia/guyana/">Australia vs Guyana: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,829 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.