Equatorial Guinea vs Tokelau: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0012 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tokelau
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
125th
Tokelau rank
126th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Tokelau
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0012 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Tokelau, a difference of 0.0012 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Tokelau ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Tokelau ranks 126th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Tokelau in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Tokelau Difference Ahead
1960s 1.43 % change on previous year 11.35 % change on previous year 9.92 % change on previous year Tokelau
1970s -5.68 % change on previous year 2.11 % change on previous year 7.79 % change on previous year Tokelau
1980s 2.28 % change on previous year 5.74 % change on previous year 3.46 % change on previous year Tokelau
1990s 2.21 % change on previous year 2.44 % change on previous year 0.2312 % change on previous year Tokelau
2000s 2 % change on previous year 1.19 % change on previous year 0.8135 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.6 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year 0.0237 % change on previous year Tokelau
2020s -0.1704 % change on previous year -0.0461 % change on previous year 0.1243 % change on previous year Tokelau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), Equatorial Guinea or Tokelau?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0012 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Tokelau as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between Equatorial Guinea and Tokelau?
0.0012 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Tokelau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Tokelau rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Tokelau ranks 126th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Tokelau: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/tokelau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/equatorial-guinea/tokelau/">Equatorial Guinea vs Tokelau: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 13,922 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.