China, Macao SAR vs Nepal: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)

China, Macao SAR
0.6349 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nepal
0.5907 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
105th
Nepal rank
106th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Nepal
-200204060196219932024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 0.6349 % change on previous year against 0.5907 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0.0442 % change on previous year.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 35 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Nepal ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 106th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 3.02 % change on previous year 1.36 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1970s 2.61 % change on previous year 0.8566 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s -0.6927 % change on previous year 6.41 % change on previous year 7.11 % change on previous year Nepal
1990s 5.23 % change on previous year 3.6 % change on previous year 1.63 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2000s 2.58 % change on previous year 3.04 % change on previous year 0.4603 % change on previous year Nepal
2010s 0.3002 % change on previous year 3.67 % change on previous year 3.37 % change on previous year Nepal
2020s 0.9444 % change on previous year 1.2 % change on previous year 0.2594 % change on previous year Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), China, Macao SAR or Nepal?
China, Macao SAR, at 0.6349 % change on previous year against 0.5907 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) between China, Macao SAR and Nepal?
0.0442 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do China, Macao SAR and Nepal rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
China, Macao SAR ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 106th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Nepal: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/nepal/">China, Macao SAR vs Nepal: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
245 places, 13,922 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.