What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Paraguay and Rwanda?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Rwanda?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Paraguay vs Rwanda: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Paraguay

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Rwanda

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Paraguay rank

37th

Rwanda rank

35th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Paraguay
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Paraguay, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.

Paraguay ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 188 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Paraguay	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0021 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0047 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0026 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1970s	0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0022 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0013 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1980s	0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1990s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2000s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2020s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Paraguay or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Paraguay and Rwanda?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Rwanda?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Paraguay and Rwanda rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Paraguay ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paraguay vs Rwanda: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/paraguay/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/paraguay/rwanda/">Paraguay vs Rwanda: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.