What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Norway?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Norway ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Norway: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Mauritius

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Norway

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Mauritius rank

159th

Norway rank

157th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Mauritius
Norway

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Mauritius, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Norway ahead.

Mauritius ranks 159th and Norway ranks 157th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Norway
1970s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
1980s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Norway
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Norway
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Norway
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Norway?: Norway, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Norway?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Mauritius ranks 159th and Norway ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Norway: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/norway/">Mauritius vs Norway: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.