What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Guatemala

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Sri Lanka

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Guatemala rank

95th

Sri Lanka rank

98th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Guatemala
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 98th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
1970s	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
1980s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
1990s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Sri Lanka
2000s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Guatemala or Sri Lanka?: Guatemala, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Guatemala and Sri Lanka rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Guatemala ranks 95th and Sri Lanka ranks 98th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/sri-lanka/">Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.