What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Gambia and Tanzania?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Tanzania?

60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Gambia vs Tanzania: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Gambia

0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Tanzania

0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Gambia rank

21st

Tanzania rank

20th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Gambia
Tanzania

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in Gambia, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 20th of 188 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Gambia	Tanzania	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0015 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0015 hectares per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1970s	0.0017 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0017 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1980s	0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
1990s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2000s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2010s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania
2020s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Gambia or Tanzania?: Tanzania, at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Gambia and Tanzania?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Tanzania?: 60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Tanzania rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Gambia ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 20th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Tanzania: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/tanzania/">Gambia vs Tanzania: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.