What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Portugal?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Portugal ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Portugal?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Denmark vs Portugal: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Denmark

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Portugal

0 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Denmark rank

138th

Portugal rank

135th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Denmark
Portugal

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 138th and Portugal ranks 135th of 188 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Denmark	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1970s	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1980s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
1990s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2000s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2010s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal
2020s	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Denmark or Portugal?: Portugal, at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Denmark and Portugal?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Portugal?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Portugal rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Denmark ranks 138th and Portugal ranks 135th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Portugal: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/portugal/">Denmark vs Portugal: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.