What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Cote d'Ivoire and Uganda?

0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Uganda?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cote d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP

Cote d'Ivoire

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Uganda

0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Cote d'Ivoire rank

28th

Uganda rank

27th

Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP over time

Cote d'Ivoire
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0 hectares per US$ of GDP.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Uganda ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cote d'Ivoire	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0035 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0069 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0034 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1970s	0.0012 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0028 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1980s	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0023 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0017 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda
1990s	0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2000s	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2010s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2020s	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP	0 hectares per US$ of GDP	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp, Cote d'Ivoire or Uganda?: Uganda, at 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2025.
What is the difference in cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp between Cote d'Ivoire and Uganda?: 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Uganda?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Uganda rank globally for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?: Cote d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Uganda ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-extent-over-the-long-term-per-unit-of-gdp/cote-d-ivoire/uganda/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Uganda: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP
Unit: hectares per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,765 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 23 October 2026

Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.